Significance of the capture of Qasaab-III

Despite the cancellation of NSA level talks Pakistan is unwilling to mend its mischievous behaviour.  Neither its attitude has changed nor its actions.  This has resulted in successful live capture of a terrorist who came across the border by Indian security forces within a month. While Indian Army enjoys high morale on capturing this terrorist on Thursday, Pakistan has been exposed again on international level. Earlier this month, the villages had nabbed a Pakistani terrorist, Naved. It was nice that the terrorist nabbed by security forces in Baramulla second time was not exhibited as earlier in enthusiasm, thus giving time to Pakistan to destroy all the proofs related to him. It is well known that Pakistan avoids treating the captured terrorists as its citizens. We feel India has undergone some changes in its policy. It appears that live capturing of a terrorist, is a part of the new strategy of Indian Security Forces. India intends to expose Pakistan through a live terrorist. That is why security forces have recently insisted on capturing of terrorists instead of killing them. Security experts also agree with this strategy. One expert says Pakistan is constantly being exposed with live capture of terrorists. However Pakistan would ignore the facts again. The world has to understand why Pakistan avoids the dialogue with India? Pakistan is supporting with its total machinery in conspiracy of spreading terrorism in India. Live captured Naved and Sajjad itself are solid proof against Pakistan, yet their interrogation can reveal the conspiracy framed by Lashkar-e-Toiba, Pak Army and ISI against India. The major fact behind Pakistan’s moving backing out from NSA level talks is that India could have submitted the solid proof based on the information collected form Naved.  Stating Kashmir as important issue in relations with India, Pakistan has always intended to take Kashmir issue on international forums, but live captured terrorists have strengthened India’s stand. We can’t understand why doesn’t India insist talking about Pakistan’s claim over Gilgit-Baltistan area of Kashmir? Why doesn’t India raise the issue of the freedom of Baluchistan?  Baluchistan got independence on 11^th August, 1947 three days before the independence of Pakistan. Despite being independent, Pakistan is forcibly occupying it, murdering its leaders. Bugati was murdered by Musharraf and the case is still going on in Pakistan.  India has till now harmed itself by adopting defensive stand regarding Kashmir on World forums.  India should also raise the fact on international levels that if Pakistan treats Occupied Kashmir as disputed territory then in which capacity it has given out thousands of kilometres area to China? Now 50000 Chinese soldiers are there to build roads and infrastructure in PoK. Why doesn’t India raise such issue that put Pakistan in a tight spot? India has got a good chance not only to expose this neighbouring country but also to force it to adopt a defensive approach.

Anil Narendra